As a result, she frequently found herself up for elimination and only staying on because one of her competitors screwed up even worse than she did that week. that is, when she wasn't zoning out on set, making huge technical mistakes and not listening to Tim Sullivan's instructions. She actually gave very good performances. Gabby West in season 2 of Scream Queens (2008).He made it as far as the final seven (out of 16) before quitting out of fear that he might actually win. While not the first Elimination Houdini in the show's history, he was the first to veer completely and deliberately into So Bad, It's Good territory, a formula that proved immensely successful in convincing the viewing public to keep him in. Defied by John Sergeant on Strictly Come Dancing.
#Houdini apprentice license error series#
The British series The Murder Game, where winner Andrew went to the Killer Game six (out of 8) times and survived (due to winning the 50-50 coin flip) before getting the correct killer in the finale, this is in contrast to the 2 other finalists who never been to the Killer Game until the finale.Leon Jackson, winner of The X Factor 2007, though he was never in the bottom 2.And if you ask the other comedians from the most recent season, Iliza Schlesinger also counts.He actually did quite well with audiences, though the rest of the contestants were the ones who felt he didn't belong on the show. Case in point: Dat Phan, the first winner of Last Comic Standing.Sometimes, the Elimination Houdini will actually win over better contestants. This, of course, fuels the Hatedom even further.
The inverse is a Shocking Elimination, in which a favored contestant is cut earlier than expected, many times in the place of the Elimination Houdini. Or, in a talent-based show, they have a fanbase who votes for them because they want to see them continue. In shows about alliances, they may be somewhat of a "Deadly Floater" who floats along then slips through the cracks in alliances, or plays enough of a social game their Entitled Bastard opponent(s) get a good "Not you!" in the final round. It is actually fully possible for the Elimination Houdini to win. A bad player may become a Houdini through stronger players actively protecting them - why knock them out now when they could be easy competition in the finals? Often this happens when Tall Poppy Syndrome kicks up. Either they get lucky and someone makes a bone-headed move that gets them on the chopping block instead, they instead gun for a different threat, a Non-Gameplay Elimination spares them for a round, or the Elimination Houdini manages to talk their way out of elimination and avoids death. They may be the second person or another target for elimination, but somehow manage to avoid it, and they can do it in several ways. There is also another form of Elimination Houdini, commonly seen in shows like Survivor in which the contestants vote people out and not the audience. It's not uncommon for these people to develop a Hatedom that takes on a life all its own. Either way, it's enough to get some loyal viewers to not watch again. On the other hand, in shows with public votes, people will often vote to keep on a contestant who's So Bad They're Good at the expense of technically superior opponents. In shows where the evictions are decided by judges, there may be Executive Meddling afoot, keeping a contestant on as a human Conflict Ball to drive up ratings. What's more, this sentiment should also be shared by the other contestants (for shows with Confession Cams) or the judges (where the home audience votes and the judges have little to no influence any more).Īnd yet, somehow, they survive for weeks and weeks. There needs to be an overwhelming consensus that the Elimination Houdini just doesn't belong on the show anymore. It's not enough for a contestant to be deemed incompetent by a mere sizable portion of viewers, though. There is one and only one trait required to be an Elimination Houdini: an utter lack of the talent necessary to win the show, especially in comparison to the other contestants, including those already eliminated. Personality can sometimes play a role, but it doesn't matter whether the contestant is a nice person or a Jerkass. However, sometimes a weak contestant will cheat elimination week after week, horrible performance after horrible performance. Some contestants just don't have that, and most are quickly jettisoned. On competition-based Reality TV, especially Talent Shows, one needs to exhibit the talent or skill necessary to win in order to justify their continuing existence on the show. Billie Green, Boycott the Caf reviews The Glee Project note Cameron quit the next episode.
0 kommentar(er)
